Labels:book | reckoner OCR: CONCLUSION Based upon the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the Fourth Circuit Cour Appeais should be reversed. This Court should hold that 1983 does nat afforct jurisdictional avenue challenge South Caro lina's parole system and i+ should further hold that South Carolina retroactive application two vear wait between parole consideration hearings does not violate the Post Facto Clause Respectfully submitted THAvIS MEDLOCK Attorney General EDWIN EVANS, EsQ Chief Deputy Attorney General CARL N LUNDBERG, Counsel of Record Chief Legal Counsel Dept. of Probati ion Parole and Pardon Services P.O. Box 50666 Columbia, 29250 {803} 734 -9207 foregoine afford year LUNDHERG Probation
(.png)
